Stanley Ann Dunham letter 1987 – Zambia (son Barack Obama born in Mombasa) by Inspector Smith
Another old letter, this one from the year 1987, surfaces indicating that Stanley Ann Dunham was doing work related to events in Africa at the time.
Please exercise your free speech in the comments section below. There are no stipulations of political correctness on this blog. Speak your mind, give us your thoughts, both objective and subjective. Share your ideas, hunches, inklings or your expertise. Please provide recommendation and corrections if you spot errors in fact within the blog report. Lastly, remember that posting a comment is much like casting a vote, so please do so.
Another wonderful find in your continued expose’of the usurper Lucas. Keep up your good work.
The HITS just keep on coming! Fantastic!
LEFT JAB, RIGHT HOOK TO BODY — Our hero, Lucas, methodically OBLITERATES the pathetic and clueless obots. I love it!
How does a purported letter of unknown provenance that does not mention President Obama “obliterate” anything?
@ bob: if you have to ask, you would never understand.
Fan of Falcon wrote:
In other words, you got nothing. Got it.
Bruce: How open is your wallet at this point? Because this entire drama is for your benefit.
@ bob: I’ll tell you what I got. I got that as I said you will never understand. In other words you are just to thick to get it. Thanks for making my point.
How about this Bob, let Bruce spend his money any way he wants. He worked for the pleasure that his dollars buy. It always amazes me how interested obots are in how other people spend their money. Why is that?
Fan of Falcon wrote:
I understand that no one can explain the relevance of a purported letter of unknown provenance that doesn’t mention President Obama. Because there is no logical explanation.
And if Bruce wants to throw away his money on a convicted forger peddling his wares, he should. It will, however, not remove President Obama from the office he currently enjoys.
Seems that the people who use the name Bob on this forum have problems with back peddling and understanding elementary concepts. They are not very bright or street wise and present as geeks that can’t be embarrassed.
Elect Trump 2016 wrote:
It would seem you have a problem articulating a specific example. Or even an elementary concept.
@ Elect Trump 2016:
Can you cite a back peddling Bob?
Is Bob and Bobj one in the same? Are they both the same person using a variation of the name Bob? Like I said, both do not seem to be very bright or street wise. Both present very geeky and lack sufficient intelligence to be embarrassed. How could Bobj not recognize the back peddling of Bob on the understanding issue of the letter as well as how Bruce spends his money. Both are pretty elementary concepts. I can hardly wait to see what they respond with now. Nonsense for sure is on the menu from these two immature, childish Bobs or Bob. Grow up already and stop being so silly!
Elect Trump 2016 wrote:
Nope; did your superior street wisdom fail you?
Because there was no “back peddling”; duh.
I would ask you to be more specific about this back peddling, but at this point all I expect is weak ad hominems and the inability to answer a simple question.
Like: What is the relevance of a purported letter, which does not reference President Obama, that is being peddled by a convicted forger?
Trump 2016, I would suggest that you not reply to Bob, I think you can see that you were right on target when you recognized that he is a immature, childish, ignorant individual. Dueling with the likes of him or Bobj is beneath you. Let these two revel in their geekiness.
Still no answer to a simple question; just more weak ad hominems.
President Obama must be quaking, no?
Ad hominem, a word that liberal, obot, anti birthers like to throw around and use incorrectly when they don’t like the accurate observations made about them. Again not very intelligent on their part, childish and immature.
Fan of Falcon, thanks for the advice but I enjoy toying with mindless idiots like the Bob’s.
Elect Trump 2016 wrote:
Nothing incorrect about the usage (and nothing accurate in your observations): You can’t answer the simple question about the relevance of a purported letter being peddled by a convicted forger, so you attack the person (and weakly, at that).
I get it: your impotent, incompetent rage hasn’t led to President Obama’s removal, so namecalling is all you have left.
No Bob you are just plain wrong. You will never “get it” not even on your best day. The observations made about you and the other Bob (if he even exists, which I doubt) are right on target. Your immaturity will not allow you to recognize the failings or shortcomings that people see in you. The silly demands you make here are just that, silly! Even when answered you deny the obvious re: the back peddling question that was answered. You and the other Bob are just silly children in adult bodies with yet to be developed adult minds capable of mature reasoning. Stay over at Doc’s or Bryant’s place where your stench can mix in with the environment. Your up junior, let’s see what you have.
@ Elect Trump 2016:
I guess I am the other Bob. Yes, I exist. Neither Bob has done any backpedaling on this issue, or on this blog; as far as I have seen. LLDS’ letter is crap. His claims are crap. This entire site is nothing but lies.
Some clear examples of backpedaling would include: agreeing to donate a body part and not following through, agreeing to testify for the world’s worst lawyer and not following through, agreeing to be represented by an actual lawyer, in a fake extradition case, and not following through.
For Trump, Fan, or any other morally repugnant fact impaired supporter of birtherism, the question remains.
What is the relevance of the latest LLDS cry for attention?
Seriously Trump/Fan/Larry/ AllCaps, you need help with your attempts to belittle people. Your insults are laughable by primary school standards, and the writing is worse than Larry’s. As for the way Bruce spends his money, I don’t care and the other bob doesn’t seem to care, but it is sad when a grown man, especially one with a wife, needs a sugardaddy. Now that is a boy trapped in a man’s body.
You’re up, gimps.
@ BobJ: After reading your post this morning I decided to go back and do some research on you Bob Jones. Seems you are a hate filled (birthers, fuck off and die) man child who has spammed this site with your nonsense. You as with most obots will not hesitate to use sock puppets or spoof a name here and there. Basically you are a loser in life and try to use this site to take revenge on people your troubled mind believes are responsible for your failures. I encourage all right thinking adults that post here to look over your past postings to see what a immature, childish, geek you are. Your every attempt here to engage the likes of Trump, Larry, Carl, Lucas, Bruce or me have failed miserably. But yet, you keep coming back for more. That seems to indicate that you are to stupid and immature to be embarrassed. Do yourself a favor and search out a class there in Korea on how to be an adult, a man.
Inquiring about the provenance of a convicted felon’s goods is a “demand” that be asked by just about everyone. (Except Bruce, of course.)
You have no answer, and instead only waste energy on weak, inaccurate, and inarticulate insults.
@ bob: Wait, are you the one who has been crowned the “clown prince” of this site or is that the other Bob?
@ Fan of Falcon:
Interesting that you would respond.
Birthers, liars, and racists should do decent people a favor.
You know what to do.
@ Fan of Falcon: if you buy that there are two Bob’s here then the Clown Prince you are asking about is the one that uses Bobj in addition to a couple other sock puppets. He is the one with the you tubes from Korea, the one that a couple of us asked Mr. Smith and Bruce not to ban here because he is such good entertainment with his crazy nonsense.
@ Larry Bland:
Larry Bland talking about using sock puppets. That is rich.
Just who is “us” Larry?
Crazy nonsense? You mean like asking questions that are never answered? You mean like responding to being caught in lies, by trying to insult me?
You feeble-minded simpletons cannot insult me. You can’t even answer basic questions, or form basic sentences.
PROTIP: writing that someone is – “to stupid..” like Fan of Falcon did is really fucking stupid. Figure out why.
As for sock puppets; I have used BobJ, and maybe other variations of not capitalizing the b or the j. I have used me as a name, and maybe even dve once.I don’t need sock puppets for the pathetic societal bottom feeders on this site, though it is fun to see who you think I may be. I am not Andrew V nor am I any variation of Bob without the last initial.
Believe or don’t believe, Larry in Illinois. I don’t fuckin’ care. Continue to watch my Youtube channel, which does not deal with birthers in the slightest; save an occasional fuck you
Simple facts:
The President of the United States was born in Hawaii.
LLDS has NEVER been to Kenya.
Prove otherwise. Or don’t.
Maybe I will come back. Maybe I won’t.
TTFN, douches
If I do come back and comment here it will be as BobJ only. The use of different names is wrong and I apologize if I confused anyone. It is not nice to mislead the mentally weak and stupid. Maybe if some of you could actually explain why LLDS’ fake letter from Zambia is relevant to the President, a real discussion could happen. Probably not, but please try some more psychoanalysis, it is hilariously incorrect and says more about you than me.
@ BobJ: see Bobby boy, that is why I went to bat for you here. You are just TOO funny! By all means come back again but be prepared to take a beating much like you have already experienced here. I outed you as a RACIST sympathizer, Mr. Smith outed you as a spammer and sock puppeteer as well as outing your name and the all TOO stupid you tube postings. So Bob Jones I bid you goodbye much like I did with other obots that tried to post here and found that they were not up to the task and turned tail and ran back to the fagblow or assorted other toilets. Oh, one last thing Bobby boy, you may want to read Rules for Radicals again.