That’s the Honorable Judge Bruce Schroeder in his Courtroom presiding over Kyle Rittenhouse’s homicide trial which is underway at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
Kyle Rittenhouse is accused of shooting the following rioters, looters and arsonists:
Their names are Joseph Rosenbaum, Gaige Grosskreutz and Anthony Huber.
When those three (3) schmucks attacked Kyle Rittenhouse he defended himself with his rifle, shooting them. Two of them died and the other was injured. This was in August of 2020 a few months after George “fentanyl” Floyd died of a drug overdose in neighboring state Minnesota. The riots, burnings and pillaging in response to Floyd’s overdose were going on for the rest of 2020 all around the country including Kenosha, Wisconsin where rapist Jacob Blake was shot while threatening police officers which lead to even more riots, burnings and pillaging.
Many in the mainstream media and at least some of the Chionists, Biden handlers, Fauci operators, the Elite (don’t dare call them by any other name), etc. probably had never heard of Judge Bruce Schroeder until very recently. Even more so after he ruled, in his Courtroom, last week that the three (3) schmucks who Rittenhouse is accused of shooting cannot be referred as “victims” by the Prosecutor(s) and that the Defense can refer to them as “rioters”, “looters” and “arsonists” –
Not that I recommend reading The Washington Post or any other mouthpiece media.
Judge Bruce Schroeder also cited the Bible a couple of days ago during the trial while he was discussing Wisconsin’s hearsay law:
“This is actually referred to in the Bible. Saint Paul, when he was put on trial . . . in . . . I think it’s Caesarea — well, it was over in Palestine — uh, in Israel — he was . . . accused of some activity. And he was a Roman citizen, which is not common, but he happened to have been a Roman citizen. So, he had rights that we share now as Americans. Uh, and — he — when they tried to put him on trial with evidence from — which was being repeated by somebody who wasn’t there and under oath — he said, “where are the witnesses against me? I am a Roman, and I have a right to confront my accusers. They should be here.” And so that led to, actually, his voyage to Rome to have his case heard before the Emperor. Um, so it’s an ancient rule; it’s strictly, strictly enforced in the criminal courts for very obvious reasons.
“Um, and, um, s0 — that’s what we’re talking about here. And, um — so — if the person who is making this descriptive material is here and can be put under oath and can be cross examined, uh, then it’s admissible, but otherwise it is not admissible through the officer here.”
You can read more about that particular discussion at:
There’s lots, lots more too. It all seems very interesting and from what I’ve read and heard (video) so far I like Judge Bruce Schroeder.
I’d like to write more tonight but I just don’t have the time available to write. Rather than wait weeks (or months sometimes) drafting the perfect article I’ll do it in parts (and publish them quickly). Thanks for stopping by WOBIK and reading Part 1!
Please exercise your free speech in the comments section below. There are no stipulations of political correctness on this blog. Speak your mind, give us your thoughts, both objective and subjective. Share your ideas, hunches, inklings or your expertise. Please provide recommendation and corrections if you spot errors in fact within the blog report. Lastly, remember that posting a comment is much like casting a vote, so please do so.
