WOBIK Blog views: 6973124

BREITBART, by  Dr. Susan Berry October 2, 2019

Excerpt:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has documented thousands of deaths linked to the puberty-blocking drugs now increasingly given to children who suffer from gender dysphoria or claim to be “transgender.”

Between 2013 and June 2019, FDA recorded 41,213 adverse events, including 6,379 deaths and 25,645 “serious” reactions in patients who took the hormone blocker known as Lupron — the same drug given to children who say their gender identity is not consistent with their biological sex.

………………………………………….

View the complete article including image, links and comments at:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/02/fda-thousands-of-deaths-linked-to-puberty-blockers/

Smith & Wesson Forums, by GunsTrucksBoatsOhMy — September 26, 2019

Excerpt:

A hundred and twelve years ago, in 1907…our great grandparents were first able to buy the first rifle pictured: The semi-automatic Winchester Model 1907. It remained in production until 1958.

This is a gun they could buy from a Sears catalogue and have delivered via US Post. Without any sort of background checks – the HORROR! It was/is a semi-automatic, high powered centerfire rifle with a detachable, high capacity magazine (5 -, 10- or 20-rounds).

About 400,000 of these were produced and sold before World War II. Civilians had hundreds of thousands of these semi-automatic rifles for 40 years, while US soldiers were still being issued old fashioned bolt action rifles.

The 1907 fired just as fast as a modern AR-15, the second rifle pictured, or semi-automatic AK-47. The “bullet” (.351 Winchester) was actually larger than those fired by the more modern looking weapons! (The AR-15 fires a round of either .223 or 5.56mm, which is smaller, while the AK-47 fires a 7.62mm round which is roughly the same size). By the way, the “AR” in AR-15 stands for Armalite Rifle, the company which first manufactured it. It does not and has never stood for “assault rifle.”

The two rifles are functionally identical. The only differences between the 1907 and the controversial and much feared AR-15 is the modern black plastic stock, the carrying handle above the upper receiver, and a pistol grip behind the trigger housing, which aids only in steadying the weapon. It does not in any way increase the lethality of either the rifle or the round it fires. Cosmetics, in other words.

To summarize:
The semi-automatic so-called “assault rifle” is 110 years old. It isn’t new in any way. The semi-automatic rifle was not a weapon of war. The government MADE IT a weapon of war 40 years after civilians had them, but added a fully automatic feature for military use – a feature which is unlawful and unavailable to civilian owners, and has been since 1938.

The semi-auto can be safely owned by civilians. The proof is that literally 3+ generations of adults owned and used them responsibly since the early part of the 20th century and no one ever even noticed. Or cared.

…………………………….

View the complete post including images and links at:

https://www.smithandwessonforums.com/forum/armory/199555-interesting-info-about-semi-auto-rifles.html

GATEWAY PUNDIT, by Cristina Laila — October 1, 2019

Excerpt:

President Trump on Tuesday evening went all in and accused the Deep State and Democrat politicians of a coup intended to take away the power of the people.

President Trump is correct. This is not impeachment, it is a COUP.

“As I learn more and more each day, I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!” Trump said in a pair of tweets Tuesday evening.

The Deep State criminals in Obama’s FBI/CIA/DOJ failed to remove President Trump with the Russian collusion canard so they are going for broke this time around.

………………………………………….

View the complete article including image, links and comments at:

“Impeach!” screech is a major diversion for Hillary’s Clinton’s third run

Canada Free Press, by Judi McLeod — October 1, 2019

Excerpt:

Hillary Clinton ‘is running again and ‘trying to decide how to fit her way in’. (Steve Bannon, Fox Business, Sept. 30, 2019)

Is being behind the Joe Biden & Son Ukraine scandal, using chairman of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (aka Deep State) stand-in Adam Schiff, fitting her way in?

Ever-whining embittered Clinton America’s No. 1 Scandal Monger

Why not? Clinton has been behind every recent major scandal afflicting America, as far back as Obama’s birth certificate, a Hillary Clinton coup, which included both the release by her staff of a photo depicting Obama in Islamic garb and her 4-year-later flytrap of blaming Donald Trump for the entire brouhaha.

It was Clinton money from Democrat coffers that paid for the Christopher Steele debunked dirty dossier.

That makes the ever-whining embittered Clinton America’s No. 1 Scandal Monger.

………………………………………

View the complete article including image, links and comments at:

https://canadafreepress.com/article/hillary-clinton-running-from-justice-for-2020-election-at-the-same-time

SPECTATOR / USA, by Meghan Murphy — September 20, 2019

Excerpt:

……………………………………

… what began as an effort to protect the rights of gay and lesbian people — still persecuted in many parts of the world — has been taken over by people fighting to allow men to access women’s locker rooms.

Indeed, the Equality Act states, ‘The bill prohibits an individual from being denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual’s gender identity.’

While the bill talks a good game, not only about protecting ‘LGBTQ’ people, but women, it simultaneously nullifies the entirety of women’s rights, by replacing instances of the term ‘sex’ in federal civil rights law with ‘sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity).’

I suspect many politicians and citizens alike genuinely wish to support trans identified people and believe the way to do this is by making ‘gender identity’ a protected category under the law, but the fact is that it isn’t possible to protect women’s rights — which are sex-based, meaning that they exist to protect those born female — and ‘gender identity’. This is because gender identity is not a material thing — meaning that it only exists in the mind of the beholder, and therefore through self-declaration. It is not something one is born with, but an ideological concept, unlike sex, which is something that cannot be changed through thought, prayer or surgery. While men should be free to reject gender stereotypes and to wear clothing that isn’t necessarily designated for their sex, they should not be free to access women’s rights (and spaces) so long as they claim to be female. Changing one’s clothes does not change one’s biology.

………………………………………

View the complete article including image, links and comments at:

https://spectator.us/democrats-equality-act-lgbtq-town-hall/