Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IRS’s Lois Lerner Pleads the Fifth -- FrontPage Magazine, Arnold Ahlert

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IRS’s Lois Lerner Pleads the Fifth -- FrontPage Magazine, Arnold Ahlert

    IRS’s Lois Lerner Pleads the Fifth

    FrontPage Magazine

    Arnold Ahlert
    5/23/2013

    Excerpt:

    Lois Lerner, director of the IRS tax-exempt organization division that targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny, put in a brief but self-serving appearance before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee yesterday. ”I have not done anything wrong,” she insisted in her opening statement. “I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations. And I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee,” she added. After reading that statement, Lerner made it clear that was as far as she was willing to go. ”I will not answer any questions or testify today,” she said. Committee Chairman Darrell Issa dismissed her and she left the building.

    Just before Lerner got up to leave, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) raised an objection. “She waived her right to testify by issuing an opening statement,” said Gowdy. “She ought to stay and answer questions.” Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), the committee’s ranking Democrat, countered that assertion. “Unfortunately this is not a federal court and she does has a right,” he said. “And we have to adhere to that.” Issa ultimately agreed with Cummings, and excused Lerner “subject to recall,” adding that he might consider giving her “limited immunity” to testify.

    Prior to the beginning of yesterday’s hearings, the Fox News division located in Cincinnati, the alleged epicenter of the scandal, revealed that the IRS’s claim that the scandal is limited to low-level employees “is falling apart.” They obtained an IRS directory that explains the agency’s chain of command, noting that each of the six Cincinnati agents involved — Mitchel Steele, Carly Young, Joseph Herr, Stephen Seok, Liz Hofacre and a woman identified only as Ms. Richards — has both a different manager and, further up the chain, a different territory manager. The purpose of the chain is to prevent rogue agents from acting on their own.

    Fox further reveals that a tax-exempt application must be processed within 270 days, or it triggers a system flag, requiring individual agents to maintain monthly status updates on cases until they are resolved. Because more than 300 groups were targeted through the Cincinnati office alone, over a period of 18 months to three years, thousands of flags would have been triggered. According to the IRS directory, a single IRS employee in Cincinnati, Cindy Thomas, the Program Manager of the Tax Exempt Division, would have received all of the flags.

    This is where the chain of command gets critical. Only four people are above Thomas: Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, who was “fired” despite the reality he was retiring next month; Joseph Grant, Commissioner of Tax Exempt and Government Entities who has also retired; Lois Lerner, who has invoked her Fifth Amendment privileges; and Holly Paz, Director of Exempt Organizations who was interviewed by the Committee on Tuesday.

    Perhaps it’s time to subpoena Cindy Thomas.

    Next up at yesterday’s hearing was Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal S. Wolin, who insisted his department knew nothing about the targeting of conservative groups. He pushed the administration’s line that President Obama and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew have “taken decisive action” to address the issues raised in the report by Treasury Inspector General (IG) for Tax Administration J. Russell George. That would be the report that insists the IRS abuse began in March of 2010, a contention debunked by the Thomas More Society, which released a public announcement August 4, 2009 about their involvement with two pro-life groups targeted by the IRS.

    The utter disingenuousness of Wolin’s contentions is underscored by another inconvenient reality. A May 14 letter signed by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp and Ranking Member Sander Levin, demanding records of any communications between the IRS and the Treasury department, as well as any between the White House and the IRS, has been ignored. Camp and Levin had given the IRS until May 21 to comply with that demand. They refused to do so, and have not responded to multiple phone and email inquiries made by CNSNews.com.

    Back at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearings, both Democrats and Republicans were outraged by the revelation that the IRS was aware its employees were targeting right-wing groups as early as May 2012, but hid that information from Congress. Issa noted that Holly Paz testified to that effect on Tuesday, revealing that an internal investigation conducted by IRS officials ended on May 3. Thus, it was established that the agency was aware of the targeting a full year prior to the release of the IG’s report.

    And far more to the point, it was aware six months before the 2012 presidential election.

    George was asked if officials at either the Treasury Dept. or the White House directed IRS employees to target conservative groups. He said officials told him “there was no direction from the department itself to those in the determinations unit in Cincinnati, nor their affiliate office in Washington.”

    Yet in a critical exchange, George revealed his investigation never probed White House involvement. “(I)n all honestly, we didn’t look at the White House. We didn’t question anyone as to whether or not they’d received any direction from the White House,” he said.
    - (bold and color emphasis added in the preceeding two paragraphs)

    During his testimony, former IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman offered up the kind of rationale that is becoming a recurring theme surrounding this story. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) asked Shulman if he took responsibility for what occurred in Cincinnati. “You know, I don’t take personal responsibility for there being a list with criteria put on it, but I do accept the fact that this did happen on my watch,” he responded. “So you don’t take responsibility, but you recognize the fact that it happened under your watch?” Speier repeated. “Look, I recognize that this happened on my watch and I’m very sorry that this happened while I was at the Internal Revenue Service,” replied Shulman.
    ..............................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-...rgeting-story/
    Last edited by bsteadman; 05-23-2013, 02:04 PM.
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Lois Lerner’s a 3-time loser

    Canada Free Press

    Judi McLeod
    5/23/2013

    Excerpt:

    Even with Obama administration-sanctioned IRS suppression—or with all odds stacked against them—the might of the Tea Party remains inspirationally epic.

    The IRS already had its hobnailed big boot down on the tail of hundreds of Tea Party groups at mid-term elections on November 2, 2010, the IRS raid against the Tea Party having kick-started in March of the same year.

    With the IRS boot at their throats, the Tea Parties stuck it to the high-riding Obama Democrats, virtually shellacking them in Nov. 2, 2010 mid-term elections.

    When the dust settled, the mainstream media were in shell shock that conservative candidates had picked up 63 House seats, six Senate seats; took control of 29 of 50 state governorships and gained a whopping 690 seats in state legislative races.

    Not bad for grassroots groups whose very purse strings were already caught up in an IRS stranglehold.

    Patriots may recall how both Barack and Michelle, untypically silent, were home in the White House on Mid-term Election Night. Barack was in the White House Treaty Room making phone calls, including one to John Boehner and Michelle reportedly went to bed early.

    The unelected czars and Hollywood stars who run the White House were undoubtedly aghast that even with the IRS holding them back, the Tea Party was victorious in mid-term elections.

    How could this have ever happened, some of them groused.

    Now it’s a matter of public record that career bureaucrat Lois Lerner, director of the IRS tax-exempt organization division targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny, leaving some of them on hold for as long as three years.

    Lerner is the self-important bureaucrat that used the same kind of harassment tactics against Christians, subjecting them to inappropriate religious inquires when she headed up the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

    “Lerner was appointed head of the FEC’s enforcement division in 1986 and stayed in that position until 2001. In the late 1990s, the FEC launched an onerous investigation of the Christian Coalition, ultimately costing the organization hundreds of thousands of dollars and countless hours in lost work. The investigation was notable because the FEC alleged that the Christian Coalition was coordinating issue advocacy expenditures with a number of candidates for office. Aside from lacking proof this was happening, it was an open question whether the FEC had the authority to bring these charges.” (weeklystandard, May 20, 2013).


    “Under the direction of Lois Lerner, the Federal Election Commission sued the Christian Coalition in the 1990s. She harassed the Christian Coalition for three election cycles. She lost her case.

    Before it was all over, she asked one conservative during the case if Pat Robertson prayed over him. (Gateway Pundit, May 22, 2013)

    In trademark arrogant Obama style, Lerner refused to answer questions before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee yesterday: “I will not answer any questions or testify today,” she said before Committee Chairman Darrell Issa shockingly dismissed her, and Elvis-like she departed the building.

    In spite of her arrogance and her public blindsiding of Issa’s committee, yesterday’s appearance should be recognized for what it was: Lois Lerner’s third straight defeat. Lerner lost the case against the Christian Coalition; a decade later proved she had zero effect on the power of patriots in the Tea Party Movement and yesterday lost face in provable scandals that will follow her the rest of her days.

    ..........................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/55414
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      Issa: IRS's Lerner 'Can Be Held in Contempt' of Congress

      Newsmax

      Paul Scicchitano
      5/23/2013

      Excerpt:

      House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said he is “deeply disappointed” that a key Internal Revenue Service official refused to answer his panel’s questions on Wednesday about her involvement in the agency’s targeting scandal, and warned that the official may be held in contempt of Congress.

      “She can be held in contempt,” Issa said on Fox’s “Hannity.” “Ultimately we are very fortunate that most people come voluntarily before our committee.”

      Lois Lerner, a mid-level official at the center of the controversy over IRS treatment of small-government groups, invoked her constitutional right not to testify in a prepared statement that may have gone too far in proclaiming her innocence.

      Issa said Lerner might be recalled to testify since she appeared to waive her constitutional right against self-incrimination in her opening statement in which she disavowed any wrongdoing, criminal or otherwise.

      "I am very proud of the work that I have done in government," Lerner said, reading from the statement at the hearing. "I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee. And while I would very much like to answer the committee’s questions today, I’ve been advised by my counsel to assert my constitutional right not to testify or answer questions related to the subject matter of this hearing.”

      The U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment allows people to stay silent to avoid incriminating themselves, but constitutional law experts, including famed attorney and Newsmax contributor Alan Dershowitz, insist that Lerner may have inadvertently waived that right by declaring her innocence of any wrongdoing.

      Issa noted that Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina raised the issue as a point of order and the committee is now awaiting a legal ruling from counsel.

      “It does appear as though clearly under precedent, her making these statements — these denials on the subject for which she was subpoenaed, in addition to some other documents she authenticated afterwards — crosses the line by quite a bit,” said Issa.

      He said that since the hearing was recessed rather than adjourned, the committee reserves the right to recall Lerner. But even that’s not the full extent of her potential exposure.

      “There’s one thing that’s a bigger problem though is if she waived her rights — as we believe she did — and Trey Gowdy made a motion that she did, the same thing will hound her in criminal investigations — the Department of Justice — anywhere else she goes,” Issa told host Sean Hannity. “If she’s committed some sort of a crime, she’s waived her rights relative to criminal prosecution which is different than us but same problem.

      Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the panel's top Democrat, said he didn't think Lerner waived her rights. "We should give her the benefit of the doubt," he told reporters.

      ................................................

      View the complete article at:

      http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/irs...5/22/id/505927
      B. Steadman

      Comment


      • #4
        Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Breaking: Lois Lerner Sued Christian Coalition In Largest FEC Action in History – Then Was Promoted, which was started 5/22/2013 by 'hope'

        The thread references a 5/22/2013 Gateway Pundit article - http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013...-to-irs-video/

        View the complete Free Republic thread at:

        http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3022734/posts

        Excerpt:

        Under the direction of Lois Lerner, the Federal Election Commission sued the Christian Coalition in the 1990s. She harassed the Christian Coalition for three election cycles. She lost her case. Lerner even asked one conservative during the case if Pat Robertson prayed over him. (Sound familiar?)

        These actions landed her at the IRS where she used the same tactics against conservatives and Christians – only on a much larger scale. 500 conservative and Christian groups were illegally targeted by the Obama IRS during her tenure. For twenty-seven months the Obama IRS refused to approve any Tea Party applications for tax-exempt status. At the same time the Obama IRS approved dozens of progressive applications.
        B. Steadman

        Comment

        Working...
        X