Announcement

**bsteadman** · 05-15-2013, 12:45 AM

Sheriff Joe's Obama ID Fraud Investigator Submits New Evidence To AL Supreme Court

Birther Report
5/14/2013

Excerpt:

CCP Affidavit for ALABAMA SUP. CT - See it HERE First!
(PPSIMMONS NEWS and MINISTRY)
May 14, 2013

Startling and hard-hitting information contained within the affidavit!
Never- before- seen information. Exclusive first look for PPSIMMONS viewers.

JUST IN (10:50 AM ET) CARL GALLUPS is in possession of the affidavit and has read it. There are 207 points of information - much of it NEVER BEFORE SEEN by the public. Hard-hitting - powerful stuff. As soon as it is lawful for Carl to release it - it will be released on PPSIMMONS - first and exclusive! Aren't you glad you are a subscriber?

Coming soon to PPSIMMONS News and Ministry Channel - You will be able to read the entire affidavit prepared by Mike Zullo, Lead Investigator, Sheriff Joe Arpaio Obama Fraud Case.

The MCSOCCP was asked to participate in the Alabama Supreme Court Obama Citizenship case. Sheriff Arpaio directed the CCP to cooperate with the Alabama Supreme Court.

PPSIMMONS will print the entire affidavit for you to read...You will see it FIRST here.

View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...-id-fraud.html

**Lucas Daniel Smith** · 05-15-2013, 03:42 AM

Available now via PDF at Patriot1980 scribd.com account:

AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL ZULLO (57 pages):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/141557773/...F-ALABAMA-Case

Original source (57 pages): Word Document available for download at:

http://www.carlgallups.com/zullo-affidavit.doc

**bsteadman** · 05-16-2013, 02:10 PM

Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Full Affidavit: Sheriff Joe Lead Obama Investigator; New Evidence Submitted In Case (Arpaio)', which was started 5/15/2013 by 'Seizethecarp'

The thread references the 5/14/2013 Birther Report article - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...ead-obama.html

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3019976/posts

To: Seizethecarp; GregNH

Many thanks seizethecarp!

Crossposting from other thread; many thanks GregNH for posting this!

http://www.carlgallups.com/zullo-affidavit.doc

To: Fred Nerks; Brown Deer; David; Spunky; LucyT

Clicking on this link will download a Word document that is 57 pages and 5.5MG Zullo Affidavit for AL Supreme Court case number 1120465

Here are some [snips]:

34. I visited Hawaii twice and continued our investigation. After further in-depth computerized testing and discovering additional information,we concluded in mid-2012 that Mr. Obama’s identity documents were not only forged beyond the legal standard of probable cause,but due to loop holes in the state of Hawaii’s vital statistics reporting laws,there was the distinct evidence suggesting that Hawaii’s statutes appeared to be in conflict with federal immigration law and posed an independent threat to the national security of the United States.

45. Investigators have determined beyond probable cause that the computer image released on April 27,2011 by the White House,and purporting to be a true computer copy of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate,is not a scan of an original hard copy document. It is,in fact,an undeniable computer generated forgery created with the sole intent to deceive the public by commission of felonious fraudulent acts.

53. As such,this computer manipulated fraudulent image cannot be deemed as acceptable legal evidence for the purpose of validation or verification of identity or citizenship,or serve as verification of a birth event by any Secretary of State in the confines of the United States.

54.Mr. Obama has not released any evidence other than a manufactured computer forgery by human intervention and design in an effort to support his claim of his birth taking place at Kapiolani Hospital,Honolulu,Hawaii on August 4,1961.

58. Investigators have also determined that the much touted 1961 newspaper announcements are in fact utterly unreliable as evidence to support verification of the event as depicted in the .pdf image of the manufactured birth certificate released by the White House and attested to my Mr. Obama. In addition the aforementioned announcements can be of no substitute for a Hawaii State Official Birth Certification and or Certificate.

153. Investigators have advised Sheriff Arpaio that several possible crimes may have been committed: 154. First,the fraudulent creation of an official document. 155. Second,the White House characterizing a forgery as an officially-produced governmental birth record; and 156. Third,Mr. Obama represented to the residents of Maricopa County and the American public that a forgery was “proof positive” of his authentic 1961 Hawaiian long-form birth certificate, thereby deceiving voters and state election commissions across the country into believing he was eligible to become President,have his name appear on Presidential ballots,thereby garnering votes from the public under false pretenses.

163. Investigators concluded that this representation of “80” that appears on Mr. Obama’s selective service card is in fact an altered 2008 pica date stamp. 164. Investigators have advised Sheriff Arpaio that several possible crimes may have been committed:

170. We discovered that data records for the entire week of August 2,1961 through August 7, 1961,were completely missing from the microfilm roll. This included the alleged date of Mr. Obama’s birth (August 4,1961).

209. Record not released including the follow: A. Original,long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate. B. Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) C. Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama) D. Obama’s adoption records E. Records of Obama’s and his mother’s repatriation as US citizens on return from return from Indonesia F. Obama’s baptism records G. Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) H. Punahou School financial aid or school records I. Occidental College financial aid records J. Harvard Law School records K. Columbia senior thesis L. Columbia College records M. Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association N. Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator O. Obama’s law client list P. Obama’s medical records Q. Obama’s passport records

It is pretty comprehensive to say the least.

1,407 posted on Wed May 15 2013 11:21:14 GMT-0500 (CDT) by GregNH (If you can’t fight, please find a good place to hide!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1405 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

9 posted on Wednesday, May 15, 2013 7:40:31 PM by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))

To: WildHighlander57; Red Steel; LucyT

Zullo destroys John Woodman’s book so loved by Fogblowers and certain Obots on FR:

22. During that meeting, all aspects of the document were examined with the intention of attempting to disprove the allegation that the document had been fabricated. This included a review of the work of an author by the name of John Woodman. John Woodman, a struggling, self-described computer expert, had authored a book putting forth explanations on how computer software automatically caused the anomalies contained in the White House document. Mr. Woodman’s work had been cited vigorously by numerous media outlets attempting to disqualify allegations suggesting that the .pdf document offered by Mr. Obama was anything but authentic.

23. The theories set forth in Mr. Woodman’s book were thoroughly tested by investigators and found to be nothing more than pure speculation and supposition. The investigators concluded Mr. Woodman’s work was nothing more than conjecture without any evidentiary proof that his theories could be supported.

24. When investigators put his theories into practical application, they could not successfully reproduce any of the anomalies found in the White House document by automated computerized process. Therefore Mr. Woodman’s work was dismissed as irrelevant and offering zero evidentiary value.

15 posted on Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:06:51 PM by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)

To: bigbob; null and void; LucyT; WildHighlander57; circumbendibus; Flotsam_Jetsome; Kenny Bunk

“We all know this. So what?”

For the first timed a COURT CERTIFIED forensic document examiner who has met the extremely high standartd (Daubert Standard) as a federal expert witness has produced a report that, unless successfully challenged meets the Federal Rules of Evidence if a court orders a discovery hearing on the authenticity of the White House pdf:

“42. Taking it a step further, investigators sought an independent authority on forensic document examination that had no previous connection with our inquiry. Investigators commissioned a court certified handwriting analyst and forensic document examiner with over 20 years of experience providing document expertise to legal and law enforcement communities, corporations, financial institutions and private individuals for this task.”

IANAL, but I had to become familiar with the “Daubert standard” that my expert witnesses would be subjected to being challenged on during my jury trail for custody of my son. Here are the key points that came out of the SCOTUS Daubert case:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard

“The Daubert standard provides a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses’ testimony during United States federal legal proceedings.”

“In 2011, Rule 702 was again amended to make the language clearer. The rule now reads:

RULE 702. TESTIMONY BY EXPERT WITNESSES

“A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if:

(a) The expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;

(b) The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;

(c) The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and

(d) The expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.”

20 posted on Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:31:34 PM by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)

**bsteadman** · 05-16-2013, 02:26 PM

CONTINUATION: Selected comments from the Free Republic thread

To: butterdezillion

(Hawaii criminal conspiracy)

Arizona’s Verification Attempts Thwarted

61. Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett requested verification of Mr. Obama’s birth records from the State of Hawaii Department of Health:

62. “Please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files.”

63. However, Hawaii Department of Health State Registrar Dr. Alvin T. Onaka did not verify the White House computer image as a true or accurate representation of the original birth record, only responding, “the information in the copy … that you attached with your request matches the original record in our file.”

64. Hawaii officials cleverly focused on the representation of information depicted in the fraudulent image diverting attention to the foundation of the request of Secretary of State Bennett. “Please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files.”

65. “Information” is not a verification of the document (.pdf file) as a whole.

66. A fraudulently created document often times contains matching information on some level when compared to some other document of record, however, the fact that some information may match in a file does not verify the legitimacy of the document as a whole.

67. In this case the .pdf image presented by the White House to the public, is in the appearance of what the unsuspecting public would perceived to be a true copy of an official document and therefore accepted on face value. This also includes the fabrication and appearance of green security paper background that one would expect to be used on such an official document. The creation and use of this background would solely be used to give the perception of authenticity in an official capacity.

68. Further, Hawaii has not acknowledged that they ever created or released an electronic computer created .pdf file containing an image of the Barack Hussein Obama II Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth to the White House or to the attorney for Barack Hussein Obama II. They also did not verify how and when information may have been added or deleted for the original file and for what purpose.

24 posted on Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:53:47 PM by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)

To: Seizethecarp

“if a court orders a discovery hearing on the authenticity of the White House pdf”

That is a mighty big if.

This new affidavit was attached to Klayman’s Motion to Strike the Amicus Curiae Brief of the Alabama Democratic Party.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/141712785/...-Amicus-Curiae

It is being introduced only for that limited issue.

Klayman is asking the Court to strike the ADP amicus brief because it contains new evidence and that is not allowed in an appeals case, but if the Court should decide not to strike the amicus brief then he is asking the court to also consider this new affidavit (even though it too is new evidence).

We’ll just have to wait to see what happens. There are a several of possibilities.

33 posted on Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:05:10 PM by 4Zoltan

**bsteadman** · 05-19-2013, 10:17 PM

Sheriff Joe to Congress: Investigate Obama's eligibility

Probe continues, but real solution rests in Washington

WND
Bob Unruh
5/19/2013

Excerpt:

Hey, while Congress is investigating the use of the IRS to harass conservative activists, is trying to find out what the Obama White House covered up about Benghazi and is looking into why the Justice Department went after reporters’ phone records, why not include a check into Obama’s eligibility, too?

That’s an idea confirmed in an affidavit filed with a legal case pending before the Alabama Supreme Court. It was brought by attorney Larry Klayman on behalf of 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, who are seeking to force Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

The case, dismissed at a lower level, is now before the Alabama Supreme Court, where strict constitutionalist Roy Moore was elected chief justice last November. The case becomes all the more intriguing because Moore is on record previously questioning Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president.

The affidavit comes from Mike Zullo, the chief of a special Cold Case Posse assembled by Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio to look into the question at the request of his constituents, who were concerned they were being defrauded by having an ineligible candidate on the 2012 election ballot.

Last year, Arpaio held a press conference at which he and Zullo outlined their findings.

“At that time, we announced that we had concluded that there was probable cause that forgery and fraud had been committed in respect of two documents: 1) the long-form or original birth certificate computer image presented by Mr. Obama, which contained multiple errors and anomalies, many of them serious and: 2) the selective-service document for Mr. Obama, which contained a two-digit year-stamp. This was contrary to specifications issued by federal regulations to the effect that the year of issue should be expressed as four digits on the stamp, and also contrary to any other selective-service registration document that we had been able to examine,” Zullo wrote in his affidavit to the Alabama court.

The result of the evidence, he said, is one conclusion.

“Accordingly, Sheriff Arpaio continues to recommend that the Congress of the United States open an immediate investigation, including the appointment of a select committee, as regards to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s documentation, whether any crimes have been committed, and to determine Mr. Obama’s eligibility for the office of president of the United States,” he said.

The Obama administration’s reaction to questions about his eligibility, which have been ongoing since before the 2008 election, has been to pooh-pooh any questions and make jokes about the questioner.

But those on the special team assembled by Arpaio to investigate are not laughing. Nor does Zullo’s affidavit to the Alabama Supreme Court joke around.

It was only a few weeks ago when Democrats quoted late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel in their demand that the case, a challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be president, be dismissed.

Get Judge Roy Moore’s classic book about his battle for liberty, “So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom.”

The party had insisted, “In order for one to accept the claim that President Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery [and that he is ineligible], one has to buy into a conspiracy theory so vast and byzantine that it sincerely taxes the imagination of reasonable minds.”

The document scoffs at “birthers” as a “tiny cabal of zealots” and quotes late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel – not widely recognized as a constitutional expert – to make its case: “These people could have personally witnessed Obama being born out of an apple pie, in the middle of a Kansas wheat field, while Toby Keith sang the National Anthem – and they’d still think he was a Kenyan Muslim.”

But Arpaio is one of few law enforcement authorities to look into the issue, and although his work largely has been under the radar in recent months, it is continuing, Zullo’s affidavit confirmed.

In a 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he’d seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” – as the U.S. Constitution requires of presidents – and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.

“This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”

More recently, when a majority of the state’s high court denied a 2012 petition filed by McInnish seeking to require an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate before the sitting president would be allowed on the state’s ballot, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.

Parker wrote, “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

In his concurrence, Parker describes McInnish’s petition as follows: “McInnish seeks from this court a writ of mandamus, directly ordering Beth Chapman, as secretary of state for the State of Alabama, ‘to demand that [President Barack Hussein] Obama cause a certified copy of his bona-fide birth certificate be delivered to her direct from the government official who is in charge of the record in which it is stored, and to make the receipt of such a prerequisite to his name being placed on the Alabama ballot for the … November 6, 2012, general election.’”

Parker, who also wrote a concurrence in another case arguing Roe v. Wade should be overturned, agreed that Arpaio’s findings were legitimate cause to question Obama’s presented documents, but nonetheless joined his fellow justices in denying McInnish’s petition.

“The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction over McInnish’s original petition,” Parker explains. “The office of the secretary of state of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction’ that this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition.”

Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court, suggesting the Supreme Court may have some opportunity for action.
....................................

View the complete article at:

http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/sheriff-j...s-eligibility/

Announcement

Exclusive Breaking News from PPSimmons on Obama Birth Certificate Forgery -- P&E

Exclusive Breaking News from PPSimmons on Obama Birth Certificate Forgery -- P&E

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment