{"id":4087,"date":"2014-03-30T07:12:28","date_gmt":"2014-03-30T11:12:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wasobamaborninkenya.com\/blog\/?p=4087"},"modified":"2014-03-30T15:11:29","modified_gmt":"2014-03-30T19:11:29","slug":"extradition-to-kenya-barack-obama-startled-by-sudden-discovery-of-russell-leslie-oppenheims-1963-kenyan-birth-certificate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wasobamaborninkenya.com\/blog\/extradition-to-kenya-barack-obama-startled-by-sudden-discovery-of-russell-leslie-oppenheims-1963-kenyan-birth-certificate\/","title":{"rendered":"Extradition to Kenya: Barack Obama startled by sudden discovery of Russell Leslie Oppenheim’s 1963 Kenyan birth certificate."},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Obama<\/a><\/p>\n

Skeptics and armchair scholars are mostly silent regarding the recent and devastating disclosure of Russell Leslie Oppenheim’s 1963 (2014 certified copy) Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya certificate of birth<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

It should also be noted that Dr. Conspiracy (i.e., Kevin Wayne Davidson, born June 16 1950, son of Oland Patrick Davidson born 12.03.1916 \u2013 died 11.20.2009 and Doris Augusta Davidson born 02.17.1921 \u2013 died 05.01.2007) refuses to take notice of and acknowledge, and intentionally disregards,\u00a0 the Russell Leslie Oppenheim document in his new March 29 2014 article titled Why did Bruce Steadman give Lucas Daniel Smith $5,800?<\/span><\/a><\/span> in which he chooses to only address and discuses Bruce Steadman, $5800.00 US dollars, deportation from Republica Dominicana to Kenya and a Dominican document called <\/span>Acta de Denuncia<\/span><\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

It appears that Dr. Conspiracy typically, and negligently, looks the other way when consequential, significant and even-handed research (presented alongside documentation and official sources) is presented just as he has on foregoing and noteworthy research such as, though by means limited to, my October 11 2013 research report titled White Mischief \u2013 Stanley Ann Dunham goes to Kenya \u2013 Act 2<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Conspiracy’s sole reference to the above referenced report was posted in a comment (Oct. 16 2013) on one of his <\/span>Occasional Open Threads:<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

\"Dr<\/a><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.obamaconspiracy.org\/2013\/10\/the-occasional-open-thread-no-whining-edition\/#comment-292583<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

I really and truly don’t believe that Dr. Conspiracy has the aptitude, capacity or integrity to address and discuss the said research.\u00a0 It appears that his writings are more geared towards the ribbing and ridiculing of Orly Taitz and Mike Zullo as well as an occasional pseudo-psychology thesis.<\/span><\/p>\n

Speaking of the <\/span>Acta de Denuncia<\/span><\/em> document (referenced above in paragraph two of today’s report) there have been a plethora of both incautious and impulsive attempts to recklessly and audaciously discredit the recent and overwhelming disclosure of the said document which was published here: <\/span>2014. Lucas Daniel Smith extradition {to Kenya} files – document 1<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Example:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

A member of The Fogbow using the handle of Raicha published a comment which, when you first read it, appears level headed and even includes a transcript of their own English translation of the Spanish (the first, and as of right now the only, translation available online).\u00a0\u00a0 The translation of the document’s language might be relatively accurate but the problem with Raicha’s comment (provided directly below) is that it is…racked with egregious errors:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"raicha<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0http:\/\/www.thefogbow.com\/forum\/viewtopic.php?p=599408#p599408<\/a><\/p>\n

Response to first (1st) observation:<\/span><\/span><\/strong> \u00a0\u00a0 We don’t know which “badge” should, or shouldn’t be, on which documents.\u00a0 There are two different badges displayed (far left and far right) on the banner (displayed directly below) of the Direcci\u00f3n Central de Investigaciones Criminales (DICRIM) website:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"badges<\/a><\/p>\n

The badge on the far right of the banner appears to be the same badge that is also on the header of the <\/span>Acta de Denuncia<\/span><\/em> document.\u00a0 Furthermore, there is a third image of a badge in the banner, on the police officer’s uniform (shoulder) itself, which also appears (though somewhat blurred) to be the same badge listed on the <\/span>Acta de Denuncia<\/span><\/em> document.\u00a0\u00a0 In any event, we don’t know which badge would, or should, be on the header of the <\/span>Acta de Denuncia<\/span><\/em> document.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Response to second (2nd) observation:<\/span><\/span><\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>Raicha stated that, <\/span>“The National Police are not on the first floor of the National Palace. They have their own headquarters on Av. Leopoldo Navarro.”<\/span> \u00a0<\/span><\/em>There is no mention of the “Palacio Nacional” (I assume you are referring to the Presidential Palace) anywhere on the <\/span>Acta de Denuncia<\/span><\/em> document. \u00a0 Nor is the “Palacio Nacional” mentioned in Raicha’s english translation.\u00a0 Who said anything about there being Policia Nacional on the first floor of the Palacio Nacional? \u00a0 Yes, the “<\/span>Palacio de la Policia Nacional”<\/span><\/span> is located on Avenida Leopoldo Navarro, but who said that it wasn’t? \u00a0\u00a0 The Policia Nacional are located in the Palacio de la Policia Nacional and no one ever said that they were located in the Palacio Nacional (the President Palace).<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yesterday (Saturday afternoon) I made a video of myself driving (the passenger who I took with me held the camera) my motorcycle to the Palacio de la Policia Nacional and then on to the Palacio Nacional (i.e., Presidential Palace).\u00a0 The said video is embedded directly below.\u00a0 Please also note that in the video I pass under a large, overhead, green-colored street sign (on Avenida John F. Kennedy) which lists the\u00a0Palacio de la Policia Nacional as the “Palacio de la Policia.” Additionally, the Palacio de la Policia Nacional building itself says “Palacio Policia Nacional.”<\/span><\/p>\n